Hope for the Iron Range economy, but we must put the past behind us
Casters are showered with sparks, or “skeeters,” as molten steel is shaped into bars called “billets” at a steel mini mill. Electric arc furnaces now comprise two-thirds of the county’s steel production. Those furnaces can’t use taconite. They require higher grade iron products such as hot briquetted iron made from direct-reduced iron pellets. Photo by David McNew/Getty Images.
At the hunting shack this year, my grandfather Ward Brown, Jr., told how a high school friend saved him from getting beat up by a Chisholm gang back around 1952. Not long after, this friend lay dead in the wreck of his restored ’32 Chevy on the road between Side Lake and Hibbing. No “Leave It To Beaver” utopia here; the 1950s were wild on northern Minnesota’s Mesabi Iron Range, wild because it seemed like it was all coming to an end.
This happened more than 70 years ago. But it’s not just grandpa’s friend who’s gone, it’s also the road where he died. This well-traveled highway between Hibbing and the Sturgeon Lake chain witnessed the eight-cylinder glory years of high powered American automobiles. But then, long before I was born, it succumbed to the blasts and shovels of the Hull Rust-Mahoning mine pit north of Hibbing.
The destruction of people, roads and the very geography of the region characterize the unflinching march of progress that dictates life on the Range. Enormous outside powers ultimately shape the lives of whole families. Families like mine. This happened before and it’s happening again right now.
The mine that ate the road now faces the depletion of its primary ore reserve and a mad scramble for new ore from Itasca County. The patterns of change continue, and we can learn from them. The lessons relate to the denizens of post-industrial mining towns, but also to millions of Americans grasping for dignity and purpose amid social change and technological advances.
Hard times before
My grandpa worked in some of the last underground iron ore mines in Minnesota. He descended shafts on all three of the state’s productive iron ranges, the Vermilion, Mesabi and Cuyuna, often in the employ of my great-grandfather, Ward Brown, Sr., who was an accomplished mining engineer.
My great-grandfather died just months after I was born. He saw me once before succumbing to cancer. His achievements came to me in stories. For instance, he designed an enormous underground cavern at a mine near Crosby. He directed men to scrape iron ore off the back of the drift in a dangerous and yet highly profitable experiment in acceptable risk. My grandpa worked on that one, very nervously.
Grandpa also told the story of repairing an underground pump at another mine near Ely as water rose from his ankles to his chest. Another time he avoided a deadly fall down an Eveleth mine shaft by landing on a rickety platform he was supposed to have removed. These are the survival stories that bonded people here. We almost died, but didn’t.
Shortly after my father was born, my grandpa’s career in underground mining ended with the industry’s gradual shutdown. A late 1950s economic downturn sent a whole generation of educated Iron Rangers elsewhere, Bob Dylan among them. My grandpa, who lived a block away from Bob, took to the road as a truck driver, another career that almost killed him several times.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
But that old iron mining was quickly supplanted by new mining — taconite — that allowed mining companies to process lower grade ore from vast new pits that dwarfed the old ones.
Today, Iron Range mining companies produce as much iron ore as they did in the early 1950s. Most people miss this fact, however, because mining companies employ fewer than a fifth of the workforce — due to automation, larger equipment and corporate consolidation.
In fact, the most mined mineral on Earth is iron ore. It’s not close. In 2021, mining companies extracted more than 2.6 billion tons of iron ore from the planet. And yet, the Mesabi Iron Range produces just shy of 40 million tons of iron ore, less than 2%of the world’s total and yet between 75-85% of what America uses to make its domestic steel supply. That surprising gap tells a story of mining’s future.
Newer steel mills use recycled steel and specialized ores, not taconite. Steel companies are busy snatching up salvage yards and recycling plants. That’s why northern Minnesota’s Mesabi Range now arrives at a crossroads remarkably similar to the one it faced when my grandpa raced those old ghost roads.
Change happens slowly, except when it happens all at once. An economic transition that began 40 years ago is about to break into a sprint. Bad news and fresh opportunities alike spew out of an industrial-grade bilge pump.
Just like the tumultuous transition from natural iron ore to taconite 70 years ago, the Iron Range today morphs from taconite to what’s known as direct-reduced iron production. With this, companies like U.S. Steel and Cleveland Cliffs promise another century of ore production, much to the relief of the region’s 4,000-plus miners and local politicians buttered on both sides by the industry.
The people of this place have ached for better times my whole life. And yet, longing for the past threatens to choke out a viable vision for the future. Northern Minnesota could be part of a climate change solution, a driver of cleaner energy and carbon-neutral transportation, and a hub for new technology.
Or it could speed like a souped-up Chevy down a road that runs out.
Assay it with me
In 2016, I toured a small private laboratory near Nashwauk called Midland Research. Its principal metallurgist, Doug Learmont, showed me an experimental ore processing plant inside the building.
At the end of the line stood a collection of barrels, each filled with a different kind of iron ore. One barrel contained washed non-magnetic ore, similar to what they mined in the old days. Another barrel bore old fashioned taconite pellets, the kind you see piled at the ore docks in Duluth today. But there were so many more barrels to see.
In one bin, I saw flux pellets, similar to taconite but mixed to different specifications. Then there were iron nuggets and direct-reduced-iron-ready pellets, higher grade ore that can be turned into direct-reduced iron, commonly called DRI. That’s the good stuff. With the increased grade of iron in each barrel, the pellets grew darker and heavier. As barrels of iron go, it was like walking from the Kia dealership onto the BMW lot.
Learmont then took me inside a kitchen-looking laboratory where he was busy melting elements in a small oven that looked like a microwave. If it weren’t for the glowing molten metal inside you might have thought he was reheating soup in a drab company break room.
All this happened six years ago. The science has progressed further since then. The Natural Resources Research Institute of the University of Minnesota-Duluth maintains facilities that do similar research, including one on the western Mesabi Range.
For instance, the NRRI created a first-of-its kind direct-reduced iron simulator. This allows companies and investors to quickly calculate the feasibility and profitability of processing different ores into DR grade iron or steel.
An industry based on financial risk tolerance gains a lot of confidence this way. The process allows faster and more successful adaptation to new ore bodies and technology.
On Oct. 7 of this year, I hosted a local public television program about the future of iron mining in Minnesota. During the program, NRRI director Rolf Weberg told me about their efforts to help Minnesota’s mining industry scale up their efforts to produce higher grade iron using lower grade ores while addressing pollution and waste mitigation.
Weberg told me that electric arc furnaces now comprise two-thirds of the county’s steel production. Those furnaces can’t use taconite. They require higher grade iron products such as hot briquetted iron made from direct-reduced iron pellets. Those were the pellets I saw in those barrels a few years ago.
This reflects something important about where the steel industry is going. Specialized, diversified products mean adaptability to changing economic conditions and environmental policies.
Cleveland Cliffs began producing direct-reduced grade iron pellets almost three years ago to serve its new hot briquetted iron (HBI) plant in Toledo, Ohio. Cliffs first produced the special DR grade pellets at Northshore Mining in Silver Bay. But this year the company moved production to the Minorca Mine in the Mesabi Range city of Virginia, part of its 2020 acquisition of Arcelor Mittal’s U.S. holdings. Northshore has been shut down ever since.
Meantime, this year U.S. Steel announced its own DR-grade pellet production at its Keewatin Taconite facility. CEO David Burritt and Gov. Tim Walz hailed the news at a much-ballyhooed Oct. 5 ceremony. Once the largest corporation on the planet Earth, U.S. Steel cuts a much more svelte silhouette on the world steel market today. Nevertheless, the company still owns America’s largest iron mine at Minntac in Mountain Iron. It’s also begun acquiring and building electric arc furnaces in anticipation of the inevitable change that industry watchers have been talking about for at least a decade.
During the New Deal in the 1930s, government horticulturists taught farmers how to rotate crops and plant wind breaks to avoid another Dust Bowl. Today, Minnesota’s NRRI guides Iron Range mines — typically more focused on today’s production goals and profits — toward a future that is coming faster than a wind storm.
Weberg puts it simply.
“What we’re trying to really deliver is to demonstrate on an industrial level what can be done so they can invest.”
The great singularity of the American economy — rich people’s money that wants to become more money — could rush to proposals that promise to revolutionize an old but indispensable industry like steel. This is especially true if they are part of a climate change solution. That prospect has already attracted the federal government.
Steel is formed from the combination of iron and carbon. Thus, “carbon neutral” steel may seem an oxymoron. But something like that is coming. And Minnesota might be in a unique position to capitalize on the new technology.
Last February, the U.S. Energy Department announced a $7 billion program to create regional hydrogen energy hubs across the nation funded by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.
Robert Zullo of States Newsroom reported in October that states were scrambling to access the new money now available for hydrogen fuel development. Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota and Wisconsin formed a coalition now among the bidders.
Hydrogen is a clean, abundant and potent element that, historically speaking, has been challenging to use safely at an industrial scale. (The words, “Oh, the humanity,” come to mind).
Hydrogen fuel might one day power long distance transportation like trucks, trains and buses. But an even bigger application might come in industrial settings like steelmaking, which produces as much as 9% of all the world’s carbon emissions.
My father — you guessed it, Ward Brown III — worked for Eveleth Taconite, now called United Taconite, in the early 1980s. He recalls how tanker trucks would be lined up 24 hours a day to maintain a constant supply of diesel fuel for the boilers that heated the iron ore. In the winter, lines of 20-30 trucks at a time were common. It staggers the mind, even more so when you consider that iron ore production is a much smaller part of steel’s carbon emissions than steelmaking itself.
A hydrogen-based steelmaking process wouldn’t just reduce fuel usage, it would replace coal altogether by using an alternative way to generate carbon atoms in the steel. If Minnesota is a federal hydrogen hub, couldn’t it be a hydrogen steel hub, too?
That’s the question. But you don’t hear elected leaders in St. Paul or the Iron Range talking about it, at least partly because the answer defies partisan views on climate change and mining.
Forty years ago this month, Gov. Rudy Perpich — the only Iron Ranger ever elected governor — made a hard pitch to German steelmaker Willy Korf to build a mini mill on the Iron Range. Only the fullness of time reveals how visionary that idea was and what a huge difference it would have made. Unfortunately, Korf and most of the steel industry went bankrupt the next year in a recession that would devastate the Iron Range of my childhood. More than 10,000 workers lost their jobs here, my father among them.
Today is different. Those losses are now fully absorbed into the region’s economy and culture, with great effect on morale and political views. But the original idea — making small batches of steel near where iron is mined — remains plausible, even more so with the advent of hydrogen-based steelmaking.
But the innovation goes even further. What if Minnesota iron didn’t just make steel, but could be used as an efficient way to store energy in cutting-edge batteries?
A viable climate change strategy entails electrification of things that once ran on gas and coal. Electricity isn’t automatically cleaner, but it’s a form of energy that can be produced many different ways, including from renewable, carbon free sources. That’s also why the sticking point on electric vehicles and solar power is really about energy storage, not energy production.
Battery technology advanced massively in the past decade, but still requires rare minerals difficult to source in sufficient quantities to eliminate the need for carbon fuels. Lithium, in particular, has been a challenge to find and, even then, can only store energy for hours.
New mining by companies like PolyMet, Teck Resources, Talon and Twin Metals promises solutions, but the reality is that northern Minnesota doesn’t have enough minerals to do the job alone, even if all those projects actually happened.
This is a well known problem, one that entrepreneurs and scientists are solving in new ways. When you don’t have enough of something, try to figure out how to use something else you have lying around.
Something like iron
That’s the concept behind iron-air batteries advanced by companies like Form Energy, profiled by Amrith Ramkumar in the Oct. 4 Wall Street Journal. Raising $450 million, much of it from global steel giant Arcelor Mittal, Form Energy wants to create modular energy storage units using direct-reduced iron — the very same iron now being used in modern steelmaking. And its results are promising; iron-air batteries can store energy for days rather than hours, greatly improving the efficiency of solar and wind energy production.
Iron-air batteries turn iron to rust and then reverse the process to release energy. As a metaphor for Rust Belt renewal, this all feels too on the nose. But it’s true.
Furthermore, iron-air batteries can be scaled up massively, stacked in small units or enormous plants. Sensing opportunity, the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy proposed Project Sundog late last year. This proposal — which requires partnership and investor support — would use the former LTV Erie processing plant now owned by PolyMet as a solar and wind energy facility.
This idea is a long way from happening, but the same could be said of proposed new mining operations. The question becomes, what’s the better option?
So, what about the environment? Green technology still uses mined elements, leaving questions about the environmental impact of mining, an inherently destructive process. There’s no way out of this that doesn’t require some mining. There again, Minnesota’s iron could be part of the solution.
The aforementioned NRRI is working on a process that uses direct-reduced iron in a chemical process that can remove sulfates from mining wastewater. Sulfates can become harmful sulfides if they escape mine pits into rivers and lakes where certain bacteria create a chemical reaction.
Environmental engineer Jeffrey Hanson is also working on an iron-based solution to the sulfate problem. His Clearwater BioLogic company tested the use of anaerobic bacteria in consuming sulfates in a mine pit near Babbitt. These bacteria consume the sulfates as food, creating waste that can then be processed with DRI into harmless, even marketable byproducts.
Try to wrap your head around this. These newer, purer iron ore products from northern Minnesota can create steel, of course, but could also be part of the delivery of renewable energy sources to make that steel and also the environmental mitigation of mining water waste. It’s like a shiny new pan that cooks dinner for you and then cleans itself.
The only problem is the price tag. The federal government, private companies and utilities will have to spend billions to make this happen, a generational investment in a new way of doing business.
To the chagrin of skeptics, mining could become a critical component of solving climate change. But for this to happen, key political leaders and industry voices would have to accept that solving the climate crisis is worth the time, money and regulations necessary to bring about change. This is not something that pro-mining lawmakers have shown much interest in doing.
If Minnesota is to maintain the so-called “world’s best” environmental policies regarding mining, and also fair wages and collective bargaining for its workers, it has to embrace its most important assets: expertise and quality of life. Right now, some of the best minds in mining work in Minnesota. Our education and health care systems are some of the best in the nation. These factors, taken together, could make northern Minnesota a hub for development of green steel, iron-air batteries, and innovation in sulfide mitigation.
This isn’t theoretical. It’s already happening in northern Sweden, to the tune of tens of thousands of new jobs tied to these very technologies.
The future of Minnesota’s iron industry will be different than its past. No longer will the Range produce a majority of the country’s raw iron content. Rather, much of that iron will come from recycled scrap. What the Range will produce is specialized iron ore used in higher value products that can’t be made from scrap alone.
In other words, we’re making a few good steaks, not a million cheeseburgers. As this business model changes, so too should the relationship between Iron Range communities and the industry they have served these past 14 decades.
New copper-nickel mines in northern Minnesota — still long shots in many ways — promise to preserve a status quo for the jobs and politics I grew up around. These mines may be necessary someday, but they’re not the jobs panaceas they claim to be. In fact, over-dependence on mining could hurt the Range long term and certainly does nothing to make up for the jobs permanently lost to automation. Growth will come from mined products and technical services, not mining itself.
As such, a local political structure focused on mining alone misses the real opportunities that this adolescent century offers. Heck, it even hurts the potential of mining.
Here’s why. If the region isn’t open to developing markets for newer iron products — iron-air batteries, sulfate mitigation or electric vehicles — then we will watch helplessly as the old markets dry up thanks to the change we resisted. The feeling of powerlessness experienced by rural workers here and elsewhere can only be reversed by participating in the actual economy, not an imagined one.
Don’t believe me? Look at the materials circulated on Wall Street by U.S. Steel and Cleveland Cliffs. They’re talking about mini mills and green steel. At the mouth of their mines we should do the same.
Twenty years ago, I attended a series of stuffy, staid meetings of official muckety-mucks in and around Hibbing in my capacity as local newspaper editor. Back then, mining bosses stated quite clearly that Hibbing Taconite would run out of ore in about 20 years.
Of course, nothing was done about this, not by either political party. Old people watched the retirement clock and young people grew old. Our region bet everything on promises made by developers and lobbyists while leaders failed to adjust to deindustrialization and a changing climate.
Perhaps now would be a good time to start. The Iron Range will remain America’s best source of iron ore for decades to come. How that may best benefit local citizens — especially the vast majority who don’t work in the mines — remains an open question.
But there is growing evidence that solutions for many of civilization’s most pressing problems — energy, pollution, climate change — may be found in these same old mines.
The old roads are rapidly aging. Soon enough, they’ll be gone, just like the past. The future of places like the Iron Range — rural places, long dependent on their natural resources — can be much brighter than their nostalgia. But we have to let the light in and accept that this region isn’t a kid anymore. We need to work smarter, not just harder.
Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.